What good looks like
A period-level labor review with validated time data, explained variance, and actions for scheduling, coaching, estimating, or payroll.
Have these details ready
- An agreed reporting period and team/location
- Approved or review-ready time entries
- Definitions for productive, billable, travel, overtime, and unassigned time
Run the workflow
-
Choose scope
Select date range, location, team, employee group, and comparison period. Use the same definition each review cycle.
-
Validate time completeness
Check missing punches, unsubmitted/uncategorized time, overlapping entries, time off, and unapproved records before analyzing percentages.
-
Review utilization
Compare available/scheduled hours with job, travel, training, meeting, leave, and idle time by person and team.
-
Review productivity and overtime
Look for repeat overruns, excessive windshield time, underloaded days, overtime concentration, and mismatches between job duration and captured labor.
-
Connect to job results
Drill into jobs with unusual hours and compare scope, crew mix, callbacks, material delays, and estimate assumptions.
-
Assign actions
Create specific owners for punch correction, schedule balancing, coaching, rate/estimate updates, or payroll review.
Check your work
Do not call the workflow complete until these statements are true.
- Time completeness is checked before conclusions
- Large variances drill to employee/job evidence
- Every material issue has a corrective owner
If something does not look right
Utilization is unexpectedly low
Check time categories, holidays, leave, missing punches, and schedule capacity before judging performance.
Reported hours exceed the day
Investigate overlapping entries and timezone/date boundaries, then correct through the approved time process.